InfoCompliance editorial policy
Who produces what is published here, how it is verified and how an error gets corrected.
What InfoCompliance is
InfoCompliance is the publication of Risks International S.A.S. on regulation, money laundering and terrorist financing risk, personal data protection and business ethics. It is written for compliance officers, statutory auditors, internal auditors and legal teams who need to know what changed in the rules and what it requires them to do. It is not a sales newsletter: what gets published is decided by regulatory relevance, not by what the firm wants to sell that week.
Who writes
Every article carries the name of the person who wrote it and is published under the editorial responsibility of Risks International S.A.S. Authors are consultants and specialists at the firm with demonstrable experience in the subjects they cover. Where a piece is the team's work rather than one person's, it is signed with the organisation's name, never with a pen name.
How what we publish is verified
Every regulatory statement is checked against the official source — circulars, decrees, statutes, opinions and releases from the Superintendency of Companies, the Financial Superintendency, the UIAF, the SIC and their counterparts in the countries we cover — and linked to that source so anyone can verify it. We do not publish figures or deadlines that cannot be traced to a public document. Where something is a draft and not yet in force, the text says so.
Dates and updates
Every article shows its publication date. If it is updated later — because the rule changed, a deadline was extended or something was corrected — the date of the last modification is recorded too, and the change is explained inside the article whenever it alters what a reader should do. We do not rewrite a date to make an old piece look recent.
Corrections
If you find an error, write to us and we will review it. Where the error is substantive — an obligation, a deadline, a figure — the article is corrected, the correction is recorded in the text itself and the modification date is updated. We do not quietly delete a wrong article: whoever read it deserves to see what changed.
Independence and commercial content
Risks International S.A.S. sells consultancy and training in the same subjects it writes about, and we say so here because keeping quiet about it would be the problem. Regulatory analysis is not conditioned on any client or sponsor, and no third party pays to appear in an article. Where content is promotional — an event, a service, a sponsorship — it is presented as such and not as analysis.
Use of artificial intelligence
Artificial intelligence tools may be used to support auxiliary tasks — finding sources, translation, copy-editing — never to generate and publish an article without review. Everything published is reviewed and approved by an identifiable person who answers for its content. We do not publish automatically generated text without human verification.
This is not legal advice
InfoCompliance reports and analyses; it does not replace an adviser's judgement on a specific case. Applying a rule requires looking at each organisation's particular situation, and no article can do that. Anyone who needs to make a decision with consequences should discuss it with their legal team or with us directly.
Newsroom contact
For corrections, right of reply, press requests or questions about this policy, write to the company's contact address. We answer every request that identifies the article and the specific point.
habeasdata@risksint.com · +57 (601) 794 1834 · Calle 25B # 39A-30, Bogotá, Colombia
InfoCompliance — Risks International S.A.S.